Why protestants dont believe in eucharist

Most importantly - the Bible very explicitly states that no one should eat or drink blood, and the laws even stated how animals had to be killed and the blood drained out, so this would be a direct contradiction to the very laws that God himself gave. Lastly, scripture is explicitly clear that Christ paid the penalty once-for-all-time. He doesn't keep dying over and over, and He isn't crucified over and over.

This is clear- all a person has to do it simply read the book of Hebrews - Christ is our high priest, who paid the penalty for all mankind once, never to be repeated, and the veil in the temple was torn in two - that was to the Holy Place- which only the high priest could enter once every year- and this gave everyone - man, women, Jew and Gentile - direct access to God.

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Why do literalist Protestants reject transubstantiation? Ask Question. Asked 3 years, 1 month ago. Active 10 months ago. Viewed 1k times.

So my questions are: Do all literalist Protestants accept transubstantiation? Do most of them? Do any of them? For the ones who don't, how do they explain what appears to be the plain words of Jesus on this? Improve this question. Nathaniel is protesting Tharpa Tharpa 1 1 silver badge 7 7 bronze badges.

Closely related: What are the Biblical arguments against Transubstantiation? Who are these Protestants that are so literalistic that they deny the existence of metaphors? Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. To understand this answer, we will look at just two aspects. Literalism When Christ said, I am the way, life, truth, what did those three things look like?

John When Jesus said, I am the door or you are a sheep, do you take this literally? John So likewise when Jesus said this, did He disappear and become a loaf of bread?

Sacrificial With lovely irony, when the bible does literally say Christ sat down as an offering priest because of His own one sacrifice, Protestants believe this, while Roman Catholics do not. But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; Heb There is no priest presuming to be Christ on earth who offers the "same" sacrifice that Christ did some 2, years ago. Improve this answer. Marc I'll see about reworking my sentence or just leaving this comment because I understand as you say that there are those who teach that their priests who seem to do so; but, what I was saying is that it doesn't happen the priest presumes it.

The reason is because Christ sat down in heaven. Sacrifice on earth done once, never to be repeated. John , which contains one of the most compelling words that convince people of transubstantiation, is seen by literalist Protestants and similar non-denominationalists as not supporting transubstantiation, not because of a lack of literalist interpretation, but because of contraindicating statements for a literal understanding of Christ's flesh and blood in the context: As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

John KJV Notice that there is an analogous statement there. John KJV If what Christ is saying is "spirit," and "the flesh profiteth nothing," in immediate response to the statement of Christ's disciples in John , then eating Christ's actual flesh and blood is not profitable without the salvation of the soul by the Holy Ghost. Moreover, a similar statement is provided later in John 7, He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.

John KJV Clearly, no one has bellies actually flowing out rivers of any water; this is figurative. Speaking as a Protestant and speaking as someone who takes a lot of care with regard to the literal text of scripture, I would say that one of my main reasons for believing that the partaking of Christ is a matter of faith and not digestion is due to Paul's words in Galatians : My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you The memorial is an outward recognition of what is already done spiritually and inwardly.

Community Bot 1. Nigel J Nigel J Starting at verse 36 Jesus begins to make clear that the unbelief represented in the crowd is not due to lack of proof but is rooted in human will and the providence of God: But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe compare Isaiah In response Jesus declares: It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. This is the entire purpose of parabolic teaching: This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.

Cyril is comfortable assuming that even those not yet baptized know enough about Christianity to realize that Christians believe in the Real Presence. Even more telling than the many Church Fathers teaching and preaching on the Real Presence of the Eucharist is the absence of Christian leaders either rejecting this Catholic position or teaching a contrary position.

If a Baptist pastor got up on Sunday and declared that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ, you could expect that there would be angry letters denouncing him as a heretic, or at least seeking to correct him.

So why is this important? To be sure, left to our own devices, you and I would get some aspects of the gospel wrong. This is the model laid out in Scripture itself. Holy Communion underpins Christian worship in many denominations. Some Christians believe that Holy Communion gives them spiritual nourishment for the week ahead. Holy Communion reminds us of the suffering and death of Christ.

Protestants believe it stays bread and wine and only represents Christ. Although the sign of the cross dates to ante-Nicene Christianity, it was rejected by some of the Reformers and is absent from some forms of Protestantism. Some, particularly Roman Catholics and Eastern Christians, might make the sign of the cross in response to perceived blasphemy.

The Catholic Church recognizes as sacramental, 1 the marriages between two baptized Protestant Christians or between two baptized Orthodox Christians, as well as 2 marriages between baptized non-Catholic Christians and Catholic Christians, although in the latter case, consent from the diocesan bishop must be …. Two Christians can marry each other, and assuming both are baptized, it is a sacrament. The Pentecostal guy does not have to become Catholic, nor does the Catholic girl have to become Pentecostal.

A happy solution might be for them to find a Charismatic Catholic community. According to other experts such as Hans J. Hillerbrand, Protestants will be as numerous as Catholics.